logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2019.01.09 2018나3350
이사장선임결의유효 확인의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs of supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 10, 2018, the Defendant held a general meeting of this case on February 10, 2018 and held the 13th standing director election (hereinafter “instant election”), and on January 19, 2018, constituted an election commission consisting of five members, including the Chairperson D, Vice-Chairperson E, Members F, G, and H, for the fair management of the instant election (hereinafter “election”).

3) In the instant election, I (No. 1), the Defendant’s 12 chief director (No. 2), the Defendant’s 12 chief director, and the Defendant’s Intervenor joining the Defendant (No. 3; hereinafter “ Intervenor”).

(4) As a result of the instant election, the chairman of the election management commission declared that the Plaintiff was elected as the representative director of the Defendant as the representative director of the third party, and issued the Plaintiff a certificate of election in accordance with the 13th executive director, among the 1,200 valid votes, among the 1,200 valid votes, 1,166 valid votes, 1269 votes, 1269 votes, 403 votes, 401 votes, and J93 votes.

B. The Intervenor’s objection to the instant election and correction 1) The Intervenor raised an objection, such as demanding re-verification to the Chairperson on the date of the instant general meeting, and the Intervenor raised an objection as to the result of the re-verification on February 12, 2018. On February 12, 2018, all members of the first ACJ 2) posted re-verification at the Defendant’s office, the Defendant’s office, and during that process, the Intervenor confirmed the provisions related to the invalidation of the articles of incorporation, Annex, Officers’ Election Regulations (hereinafter “Election Regulations”) and then requested re-examination of the invalid votes on the grounds that the votes were put in the column for candidate marks, not as indicated below.

3. The Chairperson of the Line shall be the Chairperson.

arrow