logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.10.25 2018고단2729
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 01:00 on October 03, 2018, the Defendant continued to look at the victim’s face, shoulder, and head “D main store” in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, in combination with the victim E (one’s name, half, and twenty-four years of age) and the tables that drink the alcohol, while drinking the alcohol, while drinking the victim’s face, shoulder, and shoulder, even though the victim expressed clearly his intention of refusal.

Accordingly, the defendant forcedly committed an indecent act against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (including the defendant's depth reflects on his/her depth and the first offender);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Where a conviction on the criminal facts of this case against a defendant who is obligated to register and submit personal information under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and thus the defendant is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency

Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from Disclosure Orders and Notification Orders; proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Sex Offenses (the Defendant’s age, family relationship; the background and process of the instant crime; the benefits and preventive effects expected from the instant disclosure orders and the instant notification orders; the disadvantages and side effects therefrom; etc.), there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information may not be disclosed or notified.

Since it is recognized, Article 56 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is exempted from an employment restriction order.

arrow