logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고단225
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Incheon District Court on January 30, 201, and is currently under the suspended sentence of two years, not a person handling narcotics.

The Defendant, from October 26, 2013 to November 4, 2011 of the same year, administered psychotropic drugs in an irregular manner in Seoul, Incheon, Gyeonggi-do, Chungcheongnam-nam, and Chungcheongbuk-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Requests for appraisal;

1. Investigation report (the date and place of scopon medication), and part of the telephone conversations from October 26 to November 4, 2013 by a suspect;

1. Investigation report (verification of market price of phiphonephones and calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Previous convictions: References to criminal records and application of statutes governing written judgments;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Protection of Narcotics, Etc., and Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact that the defendant administered a scopon. However, considering the fact that the defendant's response to the training of scopon and scoponists was generated as a result of the defendant's scoponal appraisal against the defendant, and that there was no detection of scopher or scoponists from the known drug claiming that the defendant used a scoponies around that time, criminal facts in the judgment are sufficiently recognized, as a result of the defendant's scopon behavior as a result of the defendant's scoponal appraisal, and that the defendant voluntarily appeared at the probation office, such

The defendant and defense counsel are without merit.

Reasons for sentencing

1. Application of the sentencing criteria (decision of type) shall be prescribed for administration, simple possession, etc. of narcotics;

Items c) and c.

Sub-paragraph (Scope of Recommendation Form) 1 to 3 years (China, Eastern Department)

2. The defendant who was sentenced to sentence denies the crime of this case.

arrow