logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.26 2017나78430
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following “the second order”, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. The dismissal of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.

Of the Defendants on the back of the Plaintiff taxi, the instant injury was caused by all negligence by the Defendants, as all the group knife knife knife knife knife, and Plaintiff knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife. (The Plaintiff asserted in the first instance trial that among the Defendants, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif

. The fourth through sixth of the first instance judgment of the Court of First Instance 1 is as follows.

1) According to Gap evidence No. 1 in the process of the instant injury, in the relevant civil case, "G was engaged in the part of the center pen of the said taxi with the left hand while calculating the taxi fee by the chief of the cryp in which the said taxi was unloaded from the said taxi. However, while one of the above crypies aboard the said cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the said cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the said

It can be recognized that the judgment was given.

However, the following circumstances are acknowledged in full view of the statements in Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, and 7 (including paper numbers), the testimony of witness G of the first instance court, the results of the partial appraisal of appraiser H of the first instance court, and the overall purport of each party's own questioning results against the Defendants of the first instance court, i.e., the Defendant B from the beginning of the case to the court of first instance.

arrow