1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 21, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with Indian nationality status as a foreigner of short-term visit (C-3).

B. On June 12, 2017, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status to the Defendant. However, on July 19, 2018, the Defendant rendered a decision to recognize refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion would be subject to persecution as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on August 10, 2018, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on October 18, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was owned by the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, the son, and two sons, who were the son, agreed to ask for the land of the son.

However, the third village and the private village have been dissatisfied with the Plaintiff’s receipt of the land of the father, and from around 2013, the Plaintiff’s father had threatened the Plaintiff’s death directly from around 2014.

On December 2014, when the Plaintiff was in a dry field where he was getting off a paddy field where the truck was about to go back to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff. On June 20, 2015, around 2015, the Plaintiff saw the Plaintiff as a group with the following: (a) the Plaintiff had been working for a farming house in the dry field; (b) the 3rd village and the 2nd and the 2nd and 3rd identity of those in the dry field where the Plaintiff had been working for a farming house; and (c) the Plaintiff would die without the Plaintiff’s own possession of land.

Although the Plaintiff reported the third village to the police, the Plaintiff did not receive any punishment by giving a bribe to the police in the third village.

The plaintiff was born to Macaro by avoiding the third village, but the plaintiff was aware of the fact and threatened with the Macaro.

Since then, the plaintiff.