The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant of the facts charged of this case, is erroneous in the misunderstanding of facts or in the misunderstanding of legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment by misapprehending the legal principles, where the defendant, who installed an automatic game machine in the game machine and issued a custody certificate, allowed customers to reuse them.

2. An ex officio determination prosecutor added "Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act" to the facts charged in this case under the name of the conjunctive crime, and applied for amendments to an indictment with the addition of the ancillary facts as stated in the separate provisions of Article 4(1)1 and Article 28(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act as stated in the separate provisions of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry. Since this court permitted this, the judgment of the court below was no longer maintained.

Even if there are such reasons for ex officio reversal, the prosecutor's assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles is still subject to the judgment of this court, so it will be examined.

3. Judgment on the prosecutor's misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

가. 주위적 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2011. 9. 15.경부터 2011. 11. 21.경까지 광주 북구 D 1층에 있는 ‘E성인오락실’ 게임장에서, 사행성유기기구인 ‘씨포카(SEA POKER)' 게임기(이하 ’이 사건 게임기‘라고 한다) 60대를 설치하고, 종업원 F 등을 고용하여 그곳을 찾은 불특정 다수의 손님들로 하여금 위 게임기에 현금을 투입하고, 자동실행장치인 속칭 ’똑딱이‘를 이용하여 자동으로 게임을 진행하면 포커게임 룰에 따라 정해진 일정한 점수를 획득하고, 일정한 비율에 따라 손님들에게 획득한 점수를 다시 이용할 수 있는 ’보관증(쿠폰)‘을 발급하여 주는 방법으로 영업을 하였다.

This is the defendant.