logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.08.13 2015가단11217
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant was awarded a subcontract from the Defendant for the Human Data Processing Works for the Pream Treatment Works for the Plcheon-si Pacheon-si Pacheon-dong Pacheon-dong, Pacheon-si, and that the Defendant completed the above construction from April 9, 2014 to October 30, 2014, and that the Plaintiff sought payment of the construction cost stated in the purport of the claim.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the construction of reinforced concrete was subcontracted to the site construction company from among the construction of the site, and the plaintiff was sub-subcontracted by the construction of the site, and that the price should be paid from the construction of the site.

In light of the evidence No. 1, No. 1, and No. 4 alone, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff was awarded a subcontract by the Defendant for the container package work, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Rather, according to the evidence No. 1, the Defendant awarded a subcontract to the site construction company for reinforced concrete construction among the sewerage maintenance works for the Seocheon-si, Seocheondong and Biodong, which was executed at the time of the contract, and it can be recognized that the construction works are also included in the Amcon package work in the construction specifications prepared at the time of the contract. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s above assertion is groundless.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow