A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 3. 11. 19:43 경 서울 광진구 B에 있는 C 슈퍼에서 폭행사건으로 112 신고를 받고 현장 출동한 D 파출소 소속 경장 E(31 세 )로부터 " 선생님 술값 지불하시고 댁에 들어가세요

"I listen to the word of "," and "I am about to see it," and "I am to see it," and am to the police officer, I am to the breath, and am to the breath of the police officer, so I am to face with the air breath.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of interference with official duties is minor in the mitigated area (one month to eight months) (i.e., assault, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties in the area of mitigation (i.e., special mitigation of persons] [decision of sentence] The crime of this case is deemed to interfere with official duties by assaulting a police officer in uniform, and thus the nature of the crime is not good; the record of criminal punishment is possible; the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and all other circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime.