1. On June 2016, 2016, the Defendant stated the Plaintiffs in the separate sheet No. 1 as “recognized Amount” and each of the above amounts.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Authorization and public notice of project implementation - The project name: The public notice of the residents' inspection of May 26, 2009 (E urban development projects; hereinafter referred to as the "instant project"): The public notice of the designation of an urban development zone and the topographic map on April 26, 2010 (F of the Gyeonggi-do public notice) on March 28, 2012, the public notice of the establishment of a development plan (G of the Gyeonggi-do public notice) on April 10, 2014 (H of the approval of the formulation of a development plan (amended by the Gyeonggi-do public notice) on April 9, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the "public notice of the project in this case"): the public notice of the items of land to be expropriated or used on April 10, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the "public notice of the project in this case"): the Defendant.

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on April 25, 2016 - The land owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) and each land indicated in the attached Table 1 Table owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) and the obstacles in this case are not contested against the obstacles, and the Plaintiffs are determined only on each land of this case below.

- The date of commencement of expropriation: The compensation for losses on June 9, 2016 - Attached Table 1 shall be as stated in the column for "amount of adjudication on expropriation".

- An appraisal corporation: an appraisal corporation for a stock company and a Sam Chang Chang Chang appraisal corporation for a stock company (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”).

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on January 19, 2017 - Contents of the ruling: The Plaintiffs’ compensation for losses for the adjudication to be expropriated shall be as indicated in attached Table 1 attached hereto with the same amount as that indicated in the relevant table 1 - An appraisal corporation: the Japanese Appraisal Corporation and the Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Appraisal of Objection”):

D. Results of appraisal by K appraiser K (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - Contents of appraisal: The amount shall be as stated in the column of “court appraisal amount” in attached Table 1.

(hereinafter referred to as "court appraisal"). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, and evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, and 10 are numbers.