The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The punishment sentenced by the first instance court to the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable;

2. In recognition of the crime, the Defendant recognized that he committed the crime and divided his mistake, without any previous conviction, who suffers from cerebrovascular after-cerebrovascular, and the wife suffers from the cerebrovascular cancer, etc., whose health is not very good and whose family is economically difficult.

However, even though the defendant has a duty to regulate an illegal game room as a police officer, he also commits an unlawful act, such as receiving a bribe regularly from the operator of the illegal game room on a regular basis, stating the amount, disclosing control information, or informing the identity of the reporter, etc., and such an act is also recognized as an unfavorable factor for sentencing, such as the fairness of police duties and the reliance thereof seriously damaged.

In full view of the aforementioned factors of sentencing and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, the means and consequence of the instant crime, and other circumstances revealed in the pleadings, the sentence sentenced by the first instance court is deemed to be adequate, and it cannot be deemed that it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, the “Horse of the Second Instance 6” in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be corrected as a “Policeman,” and the “The upper limit of the punishment” shall be added to the 15th sentence (However, the upper limit of the punishment shall be pursuant to the main sentence of Article 42 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 10259, Apr. 15, 201) and the “30 years” in the 2nd sentence of the grounds for sentencing shall be corrected to “15 years,” and shall be corrected to