1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff:

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the number of real estate indicated in the separate sheet shall be indicated in the annexed sheet 3, 4, 5, 6, and 3.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the plaintiff is the owner of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the real estate of this case"); the plaintiff is the owner of G (the representative of defendant D and E church) around March 25, 2015; and the plaintiff is entitled to 20,000,000 won for lease deposit and 1,2,6,5,000,000 won for each of the above 20,000 won for lease and 1,000,000 won for each of the above 20,000,000 won for lease and 1,000,000 won for each of the above 1,00,000 won for each of the above 2,00,000 won for each of the above 2,00,000 won for each of the above 7,000,000 won for each of the above 2,016,06,07.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are jointly obligated to jointly deliver the part of the dispute in this case to the Plaintiff, and to pay unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent calculated by the ratio of KRW 1 million per month from December 20, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of the part of the dispute in this case.

B. The above Defendants asserted that the right of retention exists since they accepted the part of the instant dispute in exchange for money exceeding KRW 30 million in the written reply submitted on November 26, 2019, which was after the closing of the argument in this case. However, the data submitted by the above Defendants alone.