logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.11 2016고단5664
사기
Text

Defendant’s 2016 High Order 8139 decided that the crime was punished by a fine of KRW 3,00,000,000, Supreme Court Decision 2016 High Order 5664, 2016 High Order 6515, 6515.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On August 21, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 29, 2015.

[2016 Highest 5664] The Defendant around April 25, 2016, from the victim E management F in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Jongno-gu, it is necessary to support the victim who is the owner of the Defendant’s employment.

One-month wage shall be paid in full by making it very difficult to do so on the face of the week.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, as the Defendant had already been in a state of being designated as a crime of the same kind of fraud, he was planning to immediately flee from the damaged person, and therefore, even if he received a monthly payment from the injured person, he did not have the intention or ability to work in the F.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and received 2.3 million won from the damaged party under the pretext of a b.3 million won in the same place.

[2016 Highest 6515] The Defendant sent 3 million won for the divorced child support to the victim employed by the Defendant at around June 20, 2016 at the victim H operation I located in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around June 20, 2016, to the victim who is the principal employer of the Defendant, who is the employer of the Defendant, and there is no living cost. Accordingly, 50,000 won should be added to 3.5 million won.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant had already been designated as a criminal act of the same kind of fraud, so that he was planning to immediately flee from the victim, and even if he was paid a monthly wage from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to work in the above I.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he obtained 3,50,000 won from the damaged person to receive 3,500,000 won as the monthly salary in the same place.

[2016 Highest 7039] On July 12, 2016, the Defendant at the “K” point of the victim C’s operation in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, for the Defendant’s employer, only three million won in advance at the time of his/her attendance at the work.

arrow