logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.10.28 2014고단1179
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of five tons or more of cargo vehicles.

On March 22, 2014, the Defendant driving the above cargo vehicle around 08:50, and driving the above cargo vehicle on a three-lane road in front of the New Zealand hotel, which is located in the 34-lane of the Mansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, the Defendant reported on the three-lane road in front of the New Zealand hotel at the right angle of North high-distance, at the speed of about 60km, according to three-lanes.

Since there is a signal, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and received the front part of the F E-P motor vehicle driven by the injured party E (the age of 31) from the right side of the course to the left side of the maF motor vehicle in direct transit under the new subparagraph (the age of 31) and then received the front part of the F-PP motor vehicle operated by the injured party G (the age of 57) who was in the atmosphere of the above cargo at the right side of the above cargo, and received the front part of the HH E-P motor vehicle operated by the injured party G (the age of 57) as the front part of the above cargo, and the injured party I (the south, 47) who was in the right side of the maF motor vehicle and was in the order of the traffic in the first way to the left side of the maF motor vehicle, and the injured party K-PP motor vehicle who was in the order of the two-lane traffic in the second way to the right side of the vehicle and received the front part of the M-PP motor vehicle at the right side.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence as above, and the victim E, suffered injury to the right dog for about two weeks, suffered injury to the victim G, suffered injury to the commercial marina in need of a treatment for about six months, suffered injury to the victim, who is a passenger of the Ecoo vehicle, and suffered injury to the victim O for about four weeks, requiring a treatment for the victim I for about two weeks.

arrow