logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.29 2016고단2550
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 2015, the Defendant, at a D office located in C around Pariju on May 2015, 2015, arrange for the victim E to be able to undergo civil engineering works and water supply works in F industrial complex immediately if he/she gives money for the purpose of know-how and expenses.

“.......”

However, at the time of competition, part of the F Industrial Complex had already been conducting land-based construction work in G, and part of the industrial complex had already been completed due to land development work in the replotting method, and H had not promised the defendant to receive orders for civil engineering work, and H had to introduce construction work not civil engineering work to the defendant. As such, the defendant had no intention or ability to arrange civil engineering work or waterway construction work to the victim.

On June 9, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 1,000,000 from the damaged person to the account of Han Bank of Justice K on June 9, 2015, for the sake of the expenses of J, and KRW 20,000,000 from the account of L, which is the lessor of the Defendant’s office, on July 1, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 1, 2015, the Defendant, at the same place as on July 1, 2015, plans to purchase access roads from the victim for the purpose of his/her own housing complex business at the time of the strike, “A plan to construct access roads after purchasing the O of the Pakistan, which is the land of the N clan, in the Mju-si.”

In order to conclude a contract for the above land, five million won is required.

The access road construction will be awarded at the face of the main place of payment of the down payment.

“.......”

However, the co-owner of the above O's land accepted only the use of the land and did not have a specific sales contract, and the defendant thought that he paid the money to P, a manager of the above land, as a charge of expenses, instead of a sales contract, and on the other hand, he concluded a sales contract thereafter.

arrow