logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.05.15 2017고단2481
전자금융거래법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium or distribute, keep and deliver any access medium while demanding, demanding, or promising to provide, demand, or promise the compensation.

Nevertheless, on March 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a telephone from a person who assumes the name of the team leader B, who was unable to borrow a loan due to low credit rating, but if it is difficult to use it, and made six passbooks to improve the credit rating by using it; and (b) lent an account and access medium to the effect that “to lend 50 million won to a corporation after six months.”

On April 2017, the Defendant, at the early 2017, set up a corporate bank account in the name of the corporation in the name of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 102-ro, 1 (D), 1 (E), 1 national bank account, 3 (G, H, and I) bank account, and 6 (G, H, and I) bank account, which are linked to the above accounts.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of J and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the criminal place

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions for the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution - The fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of offense, and the fact that the access media leased by the defendant is used for another

arrow