logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.24 2016누48036
부당이득금환수고지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court of the first instance is as follows: (a) the court’s explanation on the instant case is based on the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the following: (b) “The expenses continuously incurred in relation to an injury or disease resulting from the approval of medical care after the expiration of the scheduled medical care period of the lump-sum medical care for official duties, are subject to health insurance benefits; and (c) the expenses incurred in relation to the instant case after the expiration of the medical care period of the lump-sum medical care for official duties, which was due to the expiration of the medical care period of the instant case, are borne by the Defendant).” As such, it is consistent with the reasoning of the first instance judgment, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim, even if the Plaintiff’s claim was examined as to the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the result of the fact-finding on the public official pension of this court, is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the court of first instance. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and thus, the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed.

arrow