1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The Defendant’s eligibility for veteran’s compensation against the Plaintiff on July 7, 2015.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 21, 2014, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was assigned to the three positions of K-4 (high-speed carbon emission fraud) in the 70 group of the 25th group of the 70th group of the 25th group of the 70th group of the 20th group of the 20th group of the 20th group of the 3-4th group of the 2014 group of the 3-4th group of the 2014 group of the 20th group of the 196 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 206 group of the 3th group of the 206 group

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State under the Act on the Honorable Treatment of and Support for Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”) and for registration of persons eligible for veteran’s compensation under the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (hereinafter “Act”).

C. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the determination that there is no proximate causal relation between the instant wounds and the performance of military duties, thereby not constituting a person who rendered distinguished services to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation.

(hereinafter the above two dispositions are collectively referred to as “each of the dispositions of this case”).

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission for adjudication on each of the instant dispositions, but the said commission dismissed the said petition on November 17, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and the result of fact-finding on the 70 volunteer troops at the Army of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had received treatment for a disease before entering the hospital, but was subject to a judgment of physical grade 3 on active duty in a physical examination conducted two times, and was suffering from a little number of pains during the period of new illness training, but did not receive training.

After the completion of the new training, the plaintiff is a commander who has a pain in the 25th class group of 70 group of the company.