Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On April 24, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s bodily injury case No. 2014 High Court No. 2995 at the Daegu Suwon-dong District Court No. 31, which was located in the Daegu Suwon-gu Suwon-dong, and took an oath.

The Defendant testified to the presiding judge of the court of first instance that “A statement in the name of D containing the content that he had observed an assault at the time will have been prepared or prepared by the office employees,” which read that “A statement in the name of D containing the content that he had observed an assault at the time was prepared or prepared by the said office employees.”

However, on August 6, 2014, the Defendant’s wife E, together with the Defendant, prepared the written statement using a computer located in the “G” office operated by the Defendant in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, by using the computer located therein, and D merely stated personal information in the written statement, as above, and signed it.

Accordingly, the defendant, as a witness who has taken an oath under the law, made a false statement against his memory and perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The Daegu District Court asserted to the effect that, at the time of the preparation of the third protocol of trial in the case No. 2014 High Court case No. 2995, a copy of each protocol of examination of witness (A, H), the defendant's wife E, who is an accounting employee of the above "G" office at the time of the preparation of the statement in the name of D, had the interviewed by the defendant's wife E, and as long as D confirmed and signed the contents, the preparing entity of the above statement should be deemed D. In addition, the defendant merely stated that he did not constitute perjury in a situation where he did not properly memory one year after the date of preparation of the statement, since he stated that he did not constitute a perjury.

However, the testimony is perjury if it is false statement contrary to memory even if the content of testimony is about satisfic matters.