1. Defendant B’s appeal shall be dismissed;

2. All appeals filed by Defendant A, C, and D are dismissed.

3. The extension by this court.

1. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants

A. Fact-finding 1) Clean Credit Union (hereinafter “Cheongyang Credit Union”)

(1) A loan extended to Defendant A: (a) around May 15, 1999, KRW 13.9% per annum on interest rate of KRW 5 million; (b) 22% per annum on a delayed interest rate; and (c) May 15, 2001 on a date of expiry of the loan (hereinafter “the foregoing loan”).

(2) On December 16, 200, interest rate of KRW 12.9% per annum, delay interest rate of KRW 22% per annum, and December 16, 2002, each loan was made.2) Defendant B and C jointly and severally guaranteed Defendant A’s debt on May 15, 199, and Defendant D jointly and severally guaranteed Defendant A’s debt on Defendant A’s debt.

3) On or around March 25, 2005, the Cheongchii Mutual Union attached claims against Defendant A regarding the delayed land compensation for the land in arrears in the Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Gyeonggi-do with the right to preserve the loan, etc. as the right to the preservation. 4) on June 21, 2013, the Cheongchii Mutual Union transferred all of the loan claims ① and ② to the Plaintiff on June 21, 2013, and the Plaintiff was delegated with the authority to notify each of the above assignment of claims from the Cheongchii Mutual Union and notified Defendant A of the fact of the assignment of each of the above assignment of claims.

(B) As of November 23, 2015, the sum of the principal and interest of the instant transferee’s loan claim as of November 23, 2015 (i.e., the sum of the principal and interest of the instant transferee’s loan claim as of November 23, 2015 (i.e., the sum of the principal and interest of KRW 11,027,91 (i.e., the sum of the principal and interest of KRW 17,646,520), as indicated in the following table. (ii) (unit amount: the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition; (iii) the entry in the items of subparagraphs 1 through 9, the purport

B. The judgment of the surety obligation is to transfer the obligation to the principal obligor, unless otherwise stipulated by the parties, if a claim against the principal obligor is transferred due to the subsidiary nature or accompanying nature of the principal obligation, the obligation to set up against the surety is also transferred, and the obligation to set up against the principal obligation is also satisfied.