logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.22 2015가단34761
물품대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

As the cause of the instant claim, the Plaintiff: (a) at the construction site at the time of the Defendant’s implementation of the Highway Landscape Project between B; (b) around April 12, 2012; and (c) the same year.

6. 23. The defendant asserts that the sum total of 557 weeks 157 Won was supplied in 21 million won. Since the defendant did not pay the above goods, he sought payment.

First, the statement of No. 1 (a content-certified mail prepared by the plaintiff) and the testimony of the witness C, which correspond to the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff supplied the above standard tree to the defendant, are not believed, but there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, in full view of the statements in the evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, and 2-5 of Eul and the purport of the entire pleadings in witness D’s testimony, the plaintiff can only recognize the fact that the plaintiff, as a director of the E-stock company, supplied the above standard tree to D who was performing landscaping construction work at the above construction site.

Ultimately, the plaintiff's assertion based on the premise that the plaintiff supplied the above standard tree to the defendant is without merit.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow