Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in 13 tons of W 13 tons in navigational duties.

On August 19, 2019, the Defendant: (a) operated the aforesaid so-called “D Commercial Building and Apartment Construction Sites Act” at the night-time site in Masung City on August 16:30, 2019; and (b) moved to one area of the ground-breaking in order to reclaim the manle.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by putting a V on a concrete manle, putting a safety part on a V, putting the manle on a burner, etc., so that the manle can not get out of the knivek, and there was a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not take such safety measures as above, and adhered the above Mandole to the above Mandole, and caused the victim E (the age of 61) who was working in the surrounding area due to occupational negligence, which was attempted to move the above Mandole from the Madole, and caused the Madole due to occupational negligence.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the thring of the Bridges up to the right-hand side in need of approximately six weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statement, accusation letter, diagnosis letter, on-site photographic materials, and photographic materials of the body of victims to E;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 268 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects his mistake, and that there is no other criminal record than once a fine is imposed on the crime of this case before the crime of this case is committed. However, it is similar to the fact that the degree of injury suffered by the victim is more severe and the agreement with the victim is not reached yet.