logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고단1295
업무상횡령등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who works as a bank member of the Victim D Credit Cooperatives (hereinafter “Credit Cooperatives”) located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do from April 1, 2000 to January 18, 2013, and was in charge of deposit deposit and withdrawal, credit and general affairs.

Defendant: (a) arbitrarily released money deposited in the accounts in the name of E and G, a family member E and F managed by the E, by forging the pre-delivery list; (b) arbitrarily withdrawn the money deposited in the accounts in the name of E and G, a family member of E and E, and used it to use the money for male-child job H’s business funds and the Defendant’s personal debt repayment.

1. Around September 8, 2008, the Defendant: (a) received a request to deposit KRW 132,388,000,000 in total from E’s self-reliance deposit account (I) to E and his/her family members; and (b) made a request for a new deposit in the name of J and G, which is E and his/her family members; (c) then withdrawn KRW 76,400,000 from the above self-reliance deposit account in the name of E in the name of E and used it for personal purposes, such as not depositing KRW 35,012,00 among them into a new account designated by E, etc.; and (d) used it for personal purposes, such as withdrawing KRW 132,38,00 in total from the aforesaid self-reliance deposit account in the name of E and spending KRW 76,40,000 for the personal compromise of the victim.

The Defendant, from around that time to July 11, 2012, had been on business for the protection of the victim by the same method over 12 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1.

A total amount of KRW 167,585,674 deposited in the name of E, F and G was arbitrarily withdrawn and consumed for personal purposes.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim while on duty.

2. The defendant is a customer E, etc. who has forged a private document and exercised a falsified investigation document as described in paragraph 1.

arrow