The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, did not inflict an injury on the victim by assaulting the victim.

In addition, the injury of one victim was caused by the king's symptoms, and it was not caused by the defendant's act.

However, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. First, we examine whether the defendant has inflicted an injury by assaulting the victim.

The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the victim was used on the road from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below in the body of the defendant, by putting bridges from the opposite part of the pentice to the court of the court below.

After the future, the defendant's face has become unsatisfy by hand.

“A concrete and consistent statement has been made to the effect that it was assaulted by the Defendant in the course of responding to the noise of Obaba,” and there are reasonable circumstances to suspect the credibility of each of the above statements, i.e., a witness D and E, at the scene of the instant crime, are also made in compliance with the victim’s statement with the developments of the instant case from an investigative agency to the court below, to the court below. ③ On the day and following day of the instant case, the injury diagnosis letter issued respectively (e.g., sorrode, sorrode, sorrode, sorrode, etc.) corresponds to the victim’s above statement. ④ There are no other special motive or circumstance to make a false statement in order to gather the Defendant.