logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정936
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of B B Bbee or a car.

On May 6, 2017, when driving the said vehicle as a business of around 08:43, and driving the route for the Twit distance along the northwest of Gwangju, using one lane from the direction C from the direction C to the right-hand side, the left-hand turn is prohibited. Therefore, even though there was an occupational duty to not turn to the left, and due to a mistake of left-hand turn, the part of the Epool drive of D (42 years old) driving of the victim (42 years old) with four lanes from the direction of Gwangju ICT, which go to the intersection in accordance with the straight line, was turned to the front part of the said Vietnam or the car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dump, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents under DNA preparation;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Photographss related to traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the CD (Attachment 55 of the Investigation Records)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (a) of the Provisional Payment Order Criminal Procedure Act (i.e., reflects the fact that the driver's vehicle is covered by a comprehensive insurance, that the driver's vehicle is assessed at about 65km/h at the time of the occurrence of the accident as a result of the appraisal by the National Science Investigation and Investigation Agency, and that the speed of the damaged vehicle is appraised at about 65km/h, and that the victim's failure to perform his/her duty at a speed exceeding 60km/h of the restricted speed and that there seems to have been an aspect of contribution to the expansion of the accident due to negligence that caused the accident due to the failure to perform his/her duty

arrow