Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is working as a faculty member at the D University located in Busan Shipping Daegu, and the victim E is a professor at the same university.

Defendant F, a professor of the same university during the course of the above university conference, refers to the victim, and “I do not know about this age and do not ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-g.

I discussed “......”

The Defendant, at around April 22, 2016, at the office of the principal office of the above University, talked with G and H, a faculty member, in the above-mentioned series of stories, “F the number of stories was not able to be married and dial-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-law

2. The term “assumed.”

“The honor of the victim was damaged by publicly alleging the fact.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a record of investigation reports (as to the attachment of recording records);

1. Relevant Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel convicted him of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order: “The purpose of the Defendant’s words such as the statement of criminal facts was to report or make an action against the pertinent faculty members (G team leader, etc.) with respect to any unexpected work that occurred among the professors (i.e., there was no criminal intent for defamation), and furthermore, there was no perception of public performance since the staff members in charge did not anticipate that they would transmit the said words from the Defendant to the outside.

As such, the Defendant asserts that the intent of defamation is not recognized.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the above assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel is presented.