1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s business site in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Y-gu 61,775 square meters (hereinafter “instant business site”).

(2) A reconstruction project for 31 apartments and 3 commercial buildings in the Z apartment complex located in the Z apartment complex (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”).

For the purpose of implementing the reconstruction project, the association was established on November 30, 1997 with the members of the sectional owners who supported the reconstruction as the members of the association, and was authorized to establish the housing association on May 26, 1999. (2) Defendant E is the sectional owners of the above AO-dong (13 square meters) and Defendant I was sold the reconstructed apartment under the reconstruction project as the sectional owners of A Q Qdong (11 square meters).

B. On October 13, 2000, the Plaintiff removed the apartment and commercial buildings of the project site of this case with the approval of the project plan, and newly built AA apartment after obtaining the approval of the completion on February 28, 2005, and announced the transfer on June 28, 2007.

However, there is a problem that the Plaintiff could not transfer the ownership of the commercial building site among the business site in this case from some of the members who were sectional owners, so the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming the transfer of ownership of the commercial building site and the lawsuit claiming the payment of settlement money against some of the sectional owners from 2008 to 2014.

C. On September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff deliberated on the case of collection of additional charges at the 7th meeting of the board of representatives opened on October 7, 2014 and at the 8th meeting of the board of representatives opened on October 7, 2014. However, the Plaintiff attended 10 of the total 14 representatives and resolved to submit them to the general meeting of the members as an agenda item for the special meeting of the members with the consent of 9 members. 2) On November 20, 2014, the Plaintiff held the special meeting of the members of the association (hereinafter “instant general meeting”). The Plaintiff is expected to incur expenditure exceeding the cash held by the association, such as the purchase amount of the virtual land and interest, litigation expenses, general meeting expenses, service expenses, etc., on the ground that subparagraph 3 is an agenda item.