The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not assault or abuse victimized children E, as stated in the judgment of the court below.

2. Determination:

A. The lower court determined based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court: (i) the Defendant worked at the aforementioned D Child Care Center from August 1, 2014 to November 7, 201 of the same year and took care of three young children including the victim; (ii) the Defendant and three other young children from the same half of the same year consistently from investigative agency to the lower court, to the lower court, stated that “the Defendant had his haird around the end of August 2014 and around 2, 3, and 4 occasions each victim’s haird, and 3 to 4 times each victim’s large interest,” and (iii) the police police, who was a child care teacher, took care of the victim at the same time, took up the victim’s mental health and that the Defendant took care of the victim’s hair from the victim’s 1 to 3 times, and took care of the victim’s own health and that the Defendant took care of the victim from the victim’s 1 to 1, 2007.”

On the other hand, it is reasonable to see that the defendant was guilty.

B. The above judgment of the court below is closely consistent with the records based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below.