The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is an act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes; the period and frequency of the act of arranging sexual traffic is not many; the defendant was sentenced to the same kind of crime during the suspended execution period due to the same crime and released therefrom; the defendant repeats the same kind of crime during the repeated period after being released therefrom; taking into account the equity in punishment with the accomplice for whom the criminal judgment has already become final and conclusive; taking into account the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and the application of sentencing guidelines by the Sentencing Committee, such as the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., even if considering the favorable circumstances such as the defendant's confession and reflects his own crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of this case is unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.