1. As to the plaintiffs' KRW 1,527,00,000 and its KRW 1,441,00,000 among them, the defendant shall start on October 7, 2013, and 86,00.

1. Basic facts

A. The composition of the instant joint supply and demand for the construction of the instant joint supply and demand for the construction of the instant joint supply and demand for the Plaintiffs (in the case of the manager A of the rehabilitation company EXE construction company, EXE construction company prior to the commencement of the rehabilitation procedures) shall be constituted by a joint supply and demand organization with the method

) Desired learning Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Desiring learning”)

(BTL construction works for degree facilities in the Daegu High School of Science and Technology (hereinafter “instant construction works”).

(2) On August 23, 2011, the Plaintiffs entered into a joint supply and demand agreement with respect to the instant construction project (hereinafter “instant joint supply and demand agreement”). The representative of the instant joint supply and demand agreement is Plaintiff Hyundai Construction (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).

3) The members of the instant joint contractors jointly and severally liable for the performance of their obligations under the contract to the ordering agency. The ratio of shares of the members of the joint contractors to the members of the instant joint contractors is 33% of the Plaintiff Hyundai Construction, 12.5% of the Plaintiff Tae Young Construction, 12.5% of the Plaintiff Tae Young Global Global 12.5% of the Plaintiff Hanyang, 10% of the Plaintiff Samsung Namnam Construction, 10% of the Plaintiff Samsung Namnam Construction, 10% of the Plaintiff Sungnam Construction, 10% of the Plaintiff Sung Sung Sungwon Construction, 6% of the Plaintiff Hojin Jjin Construction, 3% of the Plaintiff Cheongjin Construction, and 3% of the construction in the instant joint contractors. (B) On June 4, 2012, the Plaintiffs entered into a preferential construction contract with the Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as the “Dajin Construction”) and set the construction period of 14,410,000 won to the contract amount of 130% of the instant construction work (hereinafter referred to as “the construction period”).

After that, on March 15, 2013, the construction period of the first subcontract of this case was changed by December 31, 2013.

2. The Plaintiffs on November 7, 2012.