logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2014가단5179763
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 15,283,00, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, and each of the said amounts amount of KRW 7,00,000 and each of the said amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On November 15, 2013, G, around 08:05, while driving a H car (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”) at the crosswalk in front of the Yacheon-dong, Busan, Busan, the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “CY”) caused a traffic accident in which the network I (hereinafter “the network,”) walking along the above crosswalk of the above road on the left side from the right side of the route while going to the left side from the roadside apartment to the Heasan corridor, which was going to the left side from the right side of the road and going to the left (hereinafter “the accident in this case”).

B. For this reason, the Deceased suffered from injury, such as the 12 scarke and pressure scarkes, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment, and had been hospitalized in the 12 chest pressure frame at a general hospital until the discharge on December 13, 2013. On the same day, he/she transferred to Jinsung and was hospitalized in the above scarkes until January 11, 2014. At the time of discharge, he/she filed an appeal for scarkesium at the time of discharge, and thereafter, on January 15, 13 of the same month, on December 24, 2015, he/she received the pain treatment for the above scarkes, from the same hospital on January 25, 2014, and was subject to the Busan 15 14 years of age directly after being hospitalized in the scarkes hospital on January 25, 2014.

C. The plaintiff A is the deceased's spouse, and the plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F are the children of the deceased, and the defendant is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant's vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 6, 8, 12, 15, 16

(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1

2. Determination

A. There is no evidence to deem that the above recognition of the establishment of liability for damages and that the deceased suffered from a disease that could cause the outbreak of waste before the instant case, and that the deceased suffered from the disease due to the instant accident.

arrow