Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On August 8, 2012, the network E (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) committed a theft without a motorcycle driver’s license on or around 18:3, on the backwards of the unregistered Traca (hereinafter referred to as “the instant Ocababababa”), and caused the death of the deceased, such as the death of the deceased, by the negligence of having the F and the Plaintiff on the front side of the extreme lucaba apartment in the front of the Yababababba-dong-dong, in the direction of the Gangwon-si in the direction of the Gangwon-do Residents’ Day, from the 1st parallel of Kcabababababa, in the direction of the Gangwon-do Residents’ Day, from the 3rd parallel of the opposite letter, in conflict with the Ncabababa driver’s car in the two lanes of the three-lane, resulting in the death of the deceased due to the injury of the brain lebababane.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
Plaintiff
B is the mother of the Plaintiff A, the Defendant C is the father of the Deceased, the mother of the Deceased, and the Plaintiff B and the Defendant D are their children.
C. On the other hand, on April 2, 2014, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking payment of damages incurred by the instant accident (hereinafter “instant separate lawsuit”) with the Seoul Central District Court 2014Kadan68561, which is the insurance company of G driving vehicles, and the said court rendered a ruling of recommending reconciliation with the purport that “Dongbu Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. shall pay Plaintiff A KRW 43 million by October 16, 2015,” which became final and conclusive as is.
[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, evidence A from 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings]
2. According to the above recognition of the liability for damages, the deceased, who is the driver of the Oral Ba, caused the accident of this case by negligence while driving the vehicle in violation of the duty of safe driving and the duty of pre-cepting the driver's license without a motorcycle driver's license. Thus, the defendants, the deceased's heir, suffered the plaintiffs'