1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 18, 2010, the Plaintiff is a corporation designated as an asbestos inspection institution under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which conducts asbestos inspection.

B. On December 10, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for asbestos inspection and measurement of asbestos concentration in the air, and asbestos concentration management services between the former and the former and the former and the latter regarding the housing redevelopment improvement project in Zone 11 of Zone 518, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, within 10 days after the completion of asbestos removal works, and conducted asbestos surveys in Zone 11 of the former and latter.

C. In conducting asbestos surveys, the Plaintiff confirmed asbestos as asbestos-containing material the asbestos slate 2129.65 square meters, night 48.42 square meters, and tex 326.88 square meters, but omitted asbestos surveys on independent urban gas pipelines.

In the absence of asbestos inspection on gas diskettes, one corporation, an asbestos dismantler, was engaged in asbestos removal work by removing asbestos slate, night, and tex from which asbestos was detected, and Cheongong Construction Co., Ltd, a removal company, was engaged in asbestos removal work from April 20, 2015.

E. On July 20, 2015, when the removal work was in progress, a civil petition was filed with the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government office to the effect that asbestos is contained in the gas pipelines, and the removal work was suspended on July 20, 2015. The Plaintiff conducted an additional asbestos inspection and confirmed asbestos in 150 urban gas pipelines among the total 199 units, and 79 units among the 150 units were already removed before the additional asbestos inspection.

F. On July 23, 2015, one L&W Co., Ltd. reported additional asbestos dismantling or removal work to the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office, and the labor inspector in charge of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office confirmed the omission of the survey of the gas diskettes, which is asbestos materials, at the time of the Plaintiff’s asbestos inspection.

(g)...