The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to 8 months and additional collection of 300,000 won) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant had shown an attitude to reflect on the confession of the instant crime, despite the fact that the Defendant had been already sentenced to two times a sentence for the same kind of crime, there is a doubt that there was a high risk of recidivism by committing the instant crime, and that there was an intention to seriously reflect and treat, and that the Defendant traded phiphones in order to alleviate the suffering from the illness.

Even if the crime of this case cannot be justified, and the defendant actively purchased and asked C to request it, and the quality of the crime is not good, such as providing a written phone to him, and other various circumstances that are the conditions for the sentencing specified in this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.