The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment (two years of suspended execution in six months of imprisonment, one hundred and sixty hours of social service) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized and reflected all his mistake, deposited 2 million won for the victim prior to the pronouncement of the judgment of the court below, and had a family member to support.

However, as a matter of calculating the drinking value, the Defendant suffered injury, such as a felbling in need of medical treatment for about four weeks, considering the victim's number of times after the victim was given an appraisal as a result of the assessment of the drinking value.

In full view of all the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, family relationship, the background and result of the instant crime, etc., and the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleading and records, the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed unfair because the Defendant was too excessive, and thus, it cannot be deemed unfair. Accordingly, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, on the grounds that the Defendant’s punishment imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.