logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단1337
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant of “2017 Highest 1337” from February 3, 2017 to February 17:20, 2017, at D, a mobile phone sales store located in the Gyeongbuk-gun, Gyeongbuk-gun, G, the mobile phone number of which is requested from the victim E (V, 19 years old) to change the mobile phone number, and the above mobile phone number is broken after completing the change of the number.

During the process of protesting, he saw the victim's bath, saw the dancing before the store, re-enters it, and sound, so that he gets out of the cell phone sales store and let the customers with the above cell phone sales store take out.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's mobile phone sales business by force.

"2017 Highest 2560"

1. On May 6, 2017, the Defendant infringed upon a residence: (a) around 10:30, the victim G in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu Dong-gu, where the victim G was well-known, caused the damage to H, by inserting the hand in the gate cresh in which the victim resides; and (b) opened the said gate and intrudes into the victim’s residence by putting the gate cresh in which the victim was able to know the Defendant.

2. After entering the above accommodation at the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1 as above, the Defendant destroyed the entrance entrance door, which is the owner of the said inspection, by setting up one time the entrance doors of the said accommodation, on the ground that the said G does not have any contact with the Defendant, thereby damaging the said entrance door to KRW 63,000.

On May 6, 2017, the Defendant damaged the shock network equivalent to KRW 60,00,00 of the market price owned by the victim, which is the employee of the restaurant, on the ground that L, who is an employee of the restaurant, interfered with the meals of other customers and frighting in the city operated by the victimJ in Daegu-gu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 137]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Written statement (2017 Height 2560);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G statements;

1. Damage;

arrow