1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B and C shared 1/2 shares of each of the instant building with respect to the building of this case, respectively, the building of this case, which is one-half square meters, 153.08 square meters, 24.32 square meters, and 226.54 square meters, on the ground of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul E-Mabrobro collective living facilities, automobile-related facilities, and detached houses (hereinafter “instant building”). On March 19, 2018, Defendant B and C were to operate the PC in the instant building, under the name of the tenant of the instant building, the Plaintiff B and C signed a lease agreement with the Plaintiff under the name of the Plaintiff’s 100,000 won, monthly rent 270,000 won, and from April 10, 2018 to April 9, 2020, the Plaintiff D and C, a real estate agent, should deposit the instant lease agreement with the Plaintiff under the name of the Plaintiff’s 500,000 won.

On May 9, 2018, F deposited 45 million won, the remainder of the lease deposit, in the account under Defendant B’s name, into the account under the name of Defendant B. From that time, F continued the facility modification work for the PC business in the instant building.

E. When the application for the PC bank business license was rejected from the Seongbuk-gu Office with respect to the underground floor of the instant building, F and Defendant B and C decided to terminate the instant lease contract around August 2018, and Defendant B and Defendant B were the bank account in the name of the Plaintiff around September 11, 2018.