logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2013.04.11 2013고단78
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 16:15 on February 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) taken advantage of the gap that does not see at the “D” 'D' 12,900 won managed by the victim E at the first floor of the building in South-gu Port, Nam-gu, Seoul; (b) cut off the clothes equivalent to KRW 40,700,000 in total, including one 'panty panty typ typ typ typ typ typ typ in an amount equivalent to KRW 7,450,00,000.

2. On February 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:25, the Defendant entered the name of F in the interrogation protocol as if he/she was his/her signature, and affixed his/her signature to F, a female student, as if he/she was his/her own signature, for the purpose of exercising his/her right to be discovered during interrogation, at the strong team office of the Posi Police Station of the Posi Police Station located in the south-gu 497 Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, Mapo-dong, the Mapo-dong 4

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the above F’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right, and issued the above interrogation protocol to G police officers belonging to the above police station who did not know that it was forged.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused (Evidence No. 18 through 25 pages of the evidence record);

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Report on investigation (in relation to correction of personal information of a suspect), report on investigation (in relation to the name and appearance of a suspect), and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. From among concurrent crimes, there are records of having been several punishments for the same type of larceny crimes with the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, and in particular, on March 25, 2011, the period of suspended execution, which became final and conclusive on April 2, 201 by having been sentenced to a suspended sentence for four months with imprisonment for larceny.

arrow