logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.01.08 2020노798
사기등
Text

1. Of the lower judgment, the part on each of the crimes listed in subparagraphs 1 and 2,590 of the 2019 High Order 2019 High Order 2015 High Order 2019 High Order 2590.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. (1) Defendant (1) did not deceiving the victim AC and the victim AJ as stated in each of the facts charged in this part of the facts charged by the High Court Decision 2019 High Order 2590.

㈎ 피해자 AC에 대한 사기의 점 피고인은 피해자 AC의 명의로 중고 외제 차를 구입하여 담보대출을 받을 수 있도록 주선하였을 뿐이고, 실제로 피해자 AC이 매수한 승용차를 담보로 AG으로부터 대출 받은 710만 원을 AC에게 현금으로 지급하였다.

㈏ 피해자 AJ에 대한 2012. 12. 1. 자 사기의 점 피고인은 피해자 AJ에게 ‘ 피해자 소유의 차량을 주면 차량을 처분하여 대출을 받아 주겠다’ 라는 말을 한 사실이 없다.

㈐ 피해자 AJ에 대한 2012. 12. 3. 자 사기의 점 피고인은 AC으로 하여금 피해자 AJ에게 ‘ 라 세 티 차량만으로는 대출금이 1,000만 원밖에 되지 않으니 인감 증명서와 주민등록 등본을 보내주면 추가 대출을 받을 수 있도록 해 주겠다’ 라는 말을 하도록 한 사실이 없다.

(2) As to the charges No. 2019 High Order No. 1542 of the lower judgment, the Defendant, who was physically and mentally weak, was drunk and physically weak at the time of committing each of the crimes in this part.

(3) The punishment sentenced by the lower court to the defendant (each of the crimes of heading 1 and heading 2015 of order 2019 and heading 2590 of order 2019 of order 2019 of order : Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, each of the crimes of heading 1542 of order 2019 of order 2019 and heading 2020 order 20 of order 2020 of order 20 of order 2020 of order : imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. An ex officio determination prosecutor maintains the name of the crime as to “the fact of the victim AJ’s fraud on December 3, 2012” as stated in the judgment of the court below when adding “Article 34(1) of the Criminal Act” to “Article 34(1) of the Criminal Act” as stated in the application of the law, and applied this part of the facts charged as follows, and the court filed an application for modification of the indictment with respect to which the facts charged are modified as follows.

arrow