Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

On December 18, 2013, the defendant appointed an attorney-at-law from the law firm B office located in the 22th floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul building, Seoul, as a complainant, and had him prepare a false complaint on F, and received it from the public service center of the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office on the same day.

A written complaint was the content that, around 02:00 on March 23, 2013, the Defendant F threatened the complainant to disclose to the public, and received money equivalent to KRW 1,325,000,000 per month from around that time, and received money with 1,325,000 won from time to time.”

However, the defendant did not have been threatened by F, and the above amount was provided at will with F in a relationship with F.

Nevertheless, the defendant filed a false complaint with F with the aim of having F receive criminal punishment when the defendant received F's notification, and filed a false complaint with F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. A written petition and written confirmation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 157, 153 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the accused accused was investigated by an investigative agency for a considerable period of time due to the Defendant’s non-determination, and is disadvantageous to the accused.

It is more favorable that the defendant's complainants agree with the defendant and do not want the punishment of the defendant, that the defendant has no criminal record other than the fine, and that the investigation agency recognizes the facts of the crime from the investigation agency and repents the wrong facts.

In addition, Article 51 of the Criminal Act that is shown in the records and pleadings of this case, such as the background, means and methods of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the character and conduct environment of the defendant.