beta
Text
1. Of the part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, the following amounts are the Plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 13, 2014, the Plaintiffs directly confirmed the current status of Defendant E, under the brokerage of Defendant E, and then purchased from Sejong Special Self-Governing City in KRW 455,299,000,000,000 for KRW 145,000,000,000 from Sejong Special Self-Governing City, and KRW 257,514,000,000 for KRW 85,000 for G forest land (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each of the instant forests”) from D (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant sales contracts”), and paid KRW 45 million to C as the down payment on the same day, and KRW 20,00 to D, respectively.
B. Each of the instant forest land is without a road leading to a public road, but a forest road is constructed (hereinafter “instant forest road”), and a forest road is established to facilitate the structural improvement of the production basis of forestry, such as efficient development of forests, advancement of use, and mechanization of forestry. In principle, the forest land is not used for other purposes, such as access roads to specific facilities, not for the original purpose of facilitating the structural improvement of the production basis of forestry.
C. At the time of the conclusion of each of the instant sales contracts, Defendant E notified the Plaintiffs that the instant forest road could be used as an access road for the construction of a new source house in each of the instant forests and fields, thereby obtaining a building permit.
In addition, as to each forest of this case delivered by Defendant E to the Plaintiffs at the time, the “a description verifying the object of brokerage” refers to the fact that each forest of this case is adjacent to the non-packaged road (5m x m).
The Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the instant C and D by asserting that “The instant forest road cannot be used as a new access road to a house owned by electric source in each forest of this case,” and that “The instant contract was revoked on this ground,” and the said court rejected the Plaintiffs’ claim (the judgment of the first instance), and became final and conclusive as it did not appeal.”
E. Defendant E is the defendant.