Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In using and managing the means of access, no one shall transfer or acquire the means of access, or promise to receive compensation, and lend or receive the means of access, unless otherwise specifically provided for in other Acts.

Nevertheless, on March 3, 2016, the Defendant promised to receive three million won per means of access via a telephone from a person with no name at the end of the end of the month, and agreed to lend the means of access to the account and acquire cash. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant sent Kwikset service article, who sent the above-mentioned name in front of the Non-Skset High School, with the name of the Defendant, sent the personal card of the new bank account (B) opened in the name of the Defendant, and notified the password by telephone.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to borrow a means of access used in electronic financial transactions to receive compensation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying financial transaction status;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act includes the act of lending means of access under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, etc. that encourages a criminal act against many unspecified persons, such as singing and Internet goods fraud. In fact, the means of access that the Defendant leased was used for the criminal act of singing that the Defendant intended to obtain economic benefits, the circumstances in which the Defendant actually acquired economic benefits do not confirm, the Defendant reported the loss of the means of access and suspended payment immediately after the Defendant lent the means of access, and thereby, the Defendant did not withdraw part of the amount of damage, and the Defendant recognized his/her mistake, and recorded the number of other means of access leased by the Defendant, etc.