1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

가. 원고의 주장 요지 피고는 원고가 돈을 빌리기 위해 경남 함안군 C에 있는 원고의 지인 D가 운영하는 휴대전화 가게에서 D와 함께 사채업자를 만났다는 사실을 알고, 2016. 9. 6. 10:30경 위 가게에서 D에게 “내가 지나가는데 보기 싫은 년이 휴대폰 가게에 앉아 있더라, 걔는 신용불량자고 월세로 사니까 돈 못 받는다. 빌려주지 마라, E마트에서 왔다하면 안다.”라는 말을 하고, 2016. 9. 7. 10:20경 같은 장소에서 D에게 “그년 기소중지자고, 전과자다.”라는 말을 하여 2회에 걸쳐 공연히 사실을 적시하여 원고의 명예를 훼손하였다.

Therefore, the defendant should pay 10 million won to the plaintiff as damages for the above illegal acts.

B. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1, 1, 2, and evidence Nos. 1, 2, as alleged by the Plaintiff, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 (a summary order of KRW 2017 Gowon District Court Msan Branch Branch 2017 High Court Decision 571), as alleged by the Plaintiff, and filed a request for formal trial (a final judgment of KRW 2017 High Court Branch 133), and received a judgment of innocence on July 4, 2017, the Prosecutor appealed (the Changwon District Court 2017No2050), but dismissed the appeal (the Supreme Court 201Do18260), but the Defendant was dismissed on January 25, 2018 and the judgment of innocence became final and conclusive.

In light of these facts, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant committed a tort that defames the Plaintiff’s reputation, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit for further examination.

2. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.