logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고정979
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On March 23, 2017, the Defendant driven a light vehicle on March 23, 2017, and made D Mart front of D Mart in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government turn to the right-hand left-hand turn from the side of E kindergarten to the right-hand left-hand turn.

Since traffic signals are installed at the intersection, it is necessary to confirm whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a right to drive the motor vehicle with a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with traffic signals, such as driving the motor vehicle safely to prevent accidents by reducing speed and driving the motor vehicle well by checking the side.

Nevertheless, when the defendant neglected to turn to the left due to the negligence of the defendant's failure, the defendant 1), the part of the bridge of the victim F(n, 27 years old) and the victim G(n, 27 years old) was shocked from the right side of the road of the defendant, and the victim's vehicle in front of the defendant's vehicle to go to the road.

In sum, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F, i.e., sugars, etc., which had no wound in two weeks open to provide approximately two-day medical treatment, and ii) the victim G suffer injury to the victim, i.e., salt ties and tensions of the light that require approximately two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in F and G;

1. Investigation report (related to the signal system for the place of accident);

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Accident scene and vehicle photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow