1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of each disposition;

A. As of December 7, 2004, 1) The Plaintiff is the forest-to-energy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ forest-to-energy”).

A) Around 01:00 on April 6, 2004, when working as the gas station belonging to the hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as brain-proof and workplace cancer at the hospital after having been charged with her head, etc. with their head, etc. with their head, etc. as of each item. (2) The Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant that the above injury and disease constituted occupational accidents. On December 7, 2004, the Defendant decided to approve the medical care for the brain-dead sugar and to refuse the medical care for the workplace cancer.

3) Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant on or around February 17, 2005, but filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee around July 7, 2005, but it was decided by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee to dismiss the request for reexamination at around that time. (B) On March 8, 2007, the Plaintiff filed an application for injury-disease compensation annuity on or around February 9, 2007 with the Defendant for medical treatment on or around April 6, 2004 for four robbery at the price of the head fest, etc. of the relevant throst, etc. with the Defendant at the price of the relevant throst, etc. of the relevant throst, such as the throst, spath, spath, chronology (including both of stress disorder disorders, and the plus, etc.) after obtaining medical treatment approval from the Defendant.

2) On March 8, 2007, the Defendant rendered a non-approval decision on the ground that the Plaintiff’s state of the injury or disease fell short of invalidity grade standards) Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for review with the Defendant, but decided on May 8, 2007 by the Defendant to dismiss the request for review, and filed a request for reexamination again with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee on or around November 19, 2007, but received a ruling to dismiss the request for reexamination from the Defendant.

C. On November 13, 2012, the Plaintiff, at around 01:00 on April 6, 2004, worked as the main source of dry Energy, and on April 6, 2004, at least four robberys, including 'price equivalent to the head, etc. due to each item, such as a 'price equivalent', chrona, scarbing, chrona, chronological stress disorder in the aftermath of bovine spongiformiformiform Enlime.