logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.07.21 2014가단45873
손해배상(자)
Text

1. B Dump trucks around 16:20 on July 25, 2014 at the Cump trucks of B driving in the vicinity of the Sim-Eup, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into an automobile insurance contract with B by setting the insurance period from August 28, 2013 to August 28, 2014 with respect to Cump truck vehicles (hereinafter “instant dump truck”). Article 8(3)2 of the said insurance contract provides that “When the insured is engaged in his/her employer’s business, losses incurred in the property owned, used, and managed by the insured’s employer shall not be compensated with substitute property.”

B. The defendant is referred to as the "victimd vehicle of this case" below D clicker.

On July 2014, the Defendant, who was the owner of the land, concluded a contract to receive KRW 600,000 in return for the request for the reclamation of F land from E during the possession of the land, and agreed to pay KRW 250,000 in return for the request to B, the owner of the instant Maritime Vehicle, who was the owner of the instant Maritime Vehicle, when he was going to perform the reclamation work. On July 25, 2014, the Defendant, who became aware of the fact that the tin would have to reclaim it on the said land and transport it to another place to the degree that it would be too large, large, large, large, and large, large, to the degree that it would have left.

C. On July 25, 2014, at around 16:20 on July 25, 2014, a car driving of the instant case: (a) the car was loaded in the vicinity of the Singu-Eup, Seopo-gu, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, and the car was loaded, and “the accident” refers to the accident of which the car was destroyed by the front glass of the Defendant driving

(ii) an event occurred. [In the absence of a dispute over the basis for recognition, the entry in Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 3, and 4-1, 2-2, the witness E- and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, since B, the driver of the instant sea vehicle, caused the instant accident, the Plaintiff is obligated to pay the insurance proceeds to the Defendant, the victim, but on the other hand, B is temporarily employed by the Defendant for the transport of rocks.

arrow