logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.06.17 2019고단1515
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch, and a fine of two hundred and five hundred thousand won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the same court on April 1, 2011, and on November 1, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of ten thousand won for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Seo branch of the Daegu District Court on November 1, 2012, and two years of suspension of the execution of ten months for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on December 17, 2014, and three years of suspension of the execution of eight months for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on December 17, 2014, and was sentenced to a imprisonment of six months for violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from 3,000 to 3,000 driver's license for the previous one of three months on the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Details of revocation of driver's licenses, disqualified meetings of the main office, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records, inquiry reports, summary orders, judgment, etc.;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1), Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the Defendant committed the instant crime only three months after he/she was committed a repeated crime due to the same kind of crime and was released therefrom, and the Defendant had been punished several times due to drunk driving and driving without license, and that the blood alcohol concentration at the time of the instant crime was significantly high.

arrow