logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.25 2017누37798
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

On January 27, 2016, while serving as a patrol member of the Seoul Southern Police Station, the Plaintiff was on board the bus to work at night on the bus to provide night resource service, and the bus was rapidly stopped and shocked with the passenger car (hereinafter “instant accident”) at the front bus exclusive route C located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu.

이 사건 사고 당시 원고의 몸이 앞쪽으로 튕겨지며 앞좌석 등받이 부분에 무릎 부위를 충격하였고, 원고는 이 사건 사고로 인하여 목과 허리 부위를 다쳐 ‘요추부 염좌, 경추부 염좌, 우측 슬관절 염좌, 요추 제5번-천추간 추간판 탈출증’ 진단을 받았다며 공무상 요양승인 신청을 하였다.

On March 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) granted medical care approval only to the Plaintiff on the basis of “Weatum base, fluorum base, the right slick base,” and (b) issued medical care non-approval (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff could not recognize a proximate causal relation with his official duties, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s medical care escape certificate (hereinafter “instant injury”) on the 5th Meetical ethical ethical ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic le

[Reasons for Recognition] The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to Gap’s evidence Nos. 6, 15, 16, Eul’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the entire pleadings as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case is legitimate was in a state of defense without any particular symptoms after being treated as “the cirral and other obstacles to the cirral ppuri disease accompanied by the nephical ppuri disease” on January 9, 2015. Although the disease of this case occurred due to the accident of this case, the disposition of this case which did not recognize a proximate causal relation with

"A disease or injury caused by official duty" prescribed in the Public Officials Pension Act.

arrow