The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual errors and misapprehension of legal principles) is as follows: (a) the Defendant was destroyed by the traffic accident in this case; (b) the Defendant’s vehicle was left alone on the road and causing considerable danger to road traffic; (c) the Defendant was phoneed to the insurance company after the accident; (d) the Defendant was released from the above place, but did not call; and (e) the Defendant had an intention to flee after the accident, and thus, was found not guilty of the facts charged in this case,

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is the Defendant who is engaged in driving of C non-Stop vehicles.

On November 1, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 04:30 on November 1, 2013, and led to the progress of the road in front of the boundary point between the Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, instead of

In such cases, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check and operate the course safety by taking into account well the front left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went away as it did not take necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and removing risks on the road, by conflicting the former owner of the Korea Electric Power Corporation established on the left side of the road with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, thereby damaging the former owner’s vehicle amounting to KRW 1,404,462.

B. According to the police interrogation protocol against the defendant in the judgment of the court below, the defendant was sent to the chief of the police as the driver's door was not opened after the accident, and the defendant was phoneed to the insurance company (Tsung fire) and the Nicecar service, but coming to the door in Kimcheon-si, coming to the opening of the taxi and going to the opening in Kimcheon-si, and was sent to F (the defendant was a person living together with the defendant, who was the defendant, and the defendant was the defendant) who is the president of Kimcheon-si, on the spot, and continued to go to him at his seat.