beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
(a) No one shall commit the act of arranging sexual traffic in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
Nevertheless, on August 28, 2014, the defendant received 130,000 won in return for sexual traffic from the "E" operated by the defendant on the fourth floor of the building D in Gangwon-si, which is operated by the defendant, in return for sexual traffic, and let F, an employee of the above business place, engage in the act of similarity with customers once.
B. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the “E” shop operated by the Defendant on the fourth floor of the building D in Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si; (b) was given to the police officer who controlled the act of arranging sexual traffic by pretending to customers, and was discovered by suspicion that female employees of the said establishment were sexual intercourse; (c) there was the history of having been punished twice for the same crime; (d) it was anticipated that a heavy criminal punishment would be imposed on the act of arranging sexual traffic; and (e) he was willing to request the indoor ter B to undergo the police investigation instead of having been conducted by the said business operator who caused the artificial tera who had been aware of the said business.
On September 4, 2014, at the above “E” store around 10:0, the Defendant, instead of the Defendant, asked the said “E” to conduct a police investigation as if he/she had arranging sexual traffic at the said store instead of the Defendant, and asked the said B to undergo an investigation as if he/she had been unemployed at the said establishment. On October 29, 2014, the Defendant had the said B undergo an investigation as if he/she had been unemployed at the said establishment, and on October 13:56, 2014, B made a false statement as if he/she was the unemployed of the said establishment.
Accordingly, the defendant had B make false statements so that the defendant escape from the person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.
2. Defendant B, around 10:00 on September 4, 2014, performed the arrangement of commercial sex acts at the above “E” shop instead of the above A.