Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. As to the grounds for appeal of this case, the Defendant’s determination on the grounds for appeal of this case is against the recognition of all the crimes of this case, the total amount of theft was not more than 1,270,000 won in cash, and the fact that the Defendant immediately returned the amount of damage to the victim and agreed with the victim smoothly after the crime was committed in relation to the facts constituting the crime of this case as indicated in the holding of the lower judgment, etc.
However, even though the defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor on November 24, 2011 due to larceny, etc., the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period; the victim took advantage of the crime of paragraph (1) as stated in the judgment of the court below; even though he had ordered the defendant to continue to work, the defendant took advantage of the victim's property in the same way as above trust of the victim; the defendant did not agree with the victim up to the trial; the crime of paragraph (2) of the judgment of the court below did not have any circumstance to deem that the defendant took measures for recovery from damage; the scope of punishment according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee for each of the crimes of this case is from eight months to two years; special larceny [Determination of types]; imprisonment with prison labor for the larceny; imprisonment with prison labor for the inside place other than residential space; imprisonment with prison labor for one year to six months; imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind to six months; imprisonment with prison labor for one-six years; imprisonment with prison labor for the same type [ins of general property];